Bainbridge, David I, Introduction to Computer Law,
Pits man Publishing, London, 1993.
Benko, Robert P, Protecting Intellectual Property
Rights: Issues and Controversies, American Enterprise
Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington,
D.C., 1989.
Besen, Stanley M, New Technologies and Intellectual
Property: An Economic Analysis, National Science Foundation,
1990.
Brier, Crespi and Straus, Biotechnology and Patent
Protection, OECD, Paris, (1985).
Bronscont, Anne W, Who Owns Information? From Privacy
to Public Access, Basic Books, New York, 1990.
Bruch, Stephen and Stabinsky, Doreen Eds, Valuing
Local Knowledge, Indigenous People and Intellectual
Property Rights, (Island Press, 1995)
Bull, Holt and Lilly, Biotechnology, International
Trends and Perspectives, OECD, Paris (1982).
Burner, Hans Peter, Closing the technology Gap, Technological
Changes in Indian Computer Industry, Sage Publications,
New Delhi, 1995.
Chaktravarthy Raghavan, Recolonistion - GATT, The
Uruguay Round and The Third World (Malaysia, 1991)
Challu, Pablo M, Patent Monopoly in Italy: Consequences
World Competition Geneva.
Clapes, Anthony Lawrence, Software: Legal Battle
for Control of the Global Software Industry, Quorum
Books, Westport, C., 1989.
Deller, Anthony Willian, Dellers Walker On
Patents, (V0l. 1, 2nd ed., 1964)
Dubey, Muchkund, An Unequal Treaty, World Trading
Order After GATT, (New Age, 1996)
Gadbaw, R Michael and Richard Timothy (editor) Intellectual
Property Rights Global Consensus, Global Conflict
West-View Press, London, 1988.
Goldtein, Paul, Copyright Highway, From Günter
berg to the Celestial, Jukebox Hill and New York,
1994.
Gopalakrishnan, N.S., Intellectual Property and Criminal
Law, (NLSIU, 1994)
Gopinath K (ed), International Conference on IPR
in Computer Software and Their Impact on Developing
Countries, IIS, Bangalore, 1992.
Iyer, Krishna V.R., Reddy, Chinnappa O, Desai D.A.
and Sachs Rajinder, Peoples Commission
on GATT, Centre for Study of Global Trade System
and Development, New Delhi, 1995.
Juma Calestous and Owjang Jackton B (editors) Innovation
and Sovereignty African Centre for technological studies,
Nairobi, Kenya, 1989.
Keayla, B.K. New Patent Regime: Implications for
Domestic Industry, Research and Development and Consumers
National Working Group on Patent Laws (NWGPL), New
Delhi, 1996.
Keayla, B.K. TRIPS System Analysis and Implications
Centre for Study of Global Trade System and Development,
New Delhi, 1997.
Kloppenburg, J.R., First the Seed, the Political
Economy of Plant Biotechnology, (Cambridge University
Press, 1988)
Lawrence, W.J.C., Plant Breeding, (London, Bercles
and Colchester, 1968).
Mansfield Edwin, Intellectual Property Protection
Foreign Direct Investment and Transfer of Technology,
Discussion Papers 19, International Finance Corporation
(IFC), 1994.
Nair K.R.G. and Ashok Kumar (editors) intellectual
Property Rights, Allied Publication, New Delhi, 1994.
Narayana P.L. The Indian Pharmaceutical Industry:
Problems and Prospects NCAER, New Delhi, 1984.
Narayanan, P. intellectual Property Law, Eastern
Law House, Calcutta, 1999 ------------, Copyright
Law, Eastern Law House, Calcutta, 1997.
National Research Council, Intellectual Property
Issues in Software, National Academy Press, Washington,
D.C., 1993.
Philip Jermy, Introduction to Intellectual Property
Rights, First Edition, Butter worth, London, 1986.
Shiva, Vandana, Captive Minds and Captive Lives,
Ethics, Ecology and Patents on Life, (Research Foundation
of Science, Technology and Natural Resources Policy,
1995).
Smith, Eric H, Trade Losses Due to Piracy and Other
Market Access Restrictions Affecting the US Copyright
Industries: A Report to the US Trade Representative,
The Alliance, Washington, 1990.
Wallerstein, Mitchel. B., et al., ed., Global Dimensions
of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology,
(National Academy Press, 1993).
Alam, Ghayur Impact of the prepared changes
in JPR on Indias pharmaceutical Industry
prepared for Indian Council for Research on International
Economic relations and United Nations Development
Programme, 1996.
Abiomats, Philp, Copyright Misuse and Anti-Competitive
Software Licenses Restrictions: Laser comb.......
America Inc V Reynolds, University of Pittsburgh
Law Review, Vol-52. Spring 1991, pp.629-67.
Ahamed, Mohamed Lawa land Izzatullah Legal
Protections For Pharmaceutical Technology Indian
Bar Review Vol-19, No.(334) 1992.
Alsta Norm, A Dry period Forbes April
- 24, 1995.
Anand, Nitya, Patent Law; The Indian Experience,
in A Commitment in Defense of Indian Patent regime.
Occasional Papers, NWGPL, New Delhi, 1991.
Bainbridge, David I, Computer Programs: More
Exceptions to Infringement Modern Law Review,
pp. 591-99.
Bender, David Protection of Computer Programs:
The Copyright Trade Secret Interface University
of Pittsburgh Law Review Vol. 47, Spring 1986, pp.
907-58.
Bijman, Jos. Biosafety Regulation, Biotechnology
and Development Monitor, No.18, (1994).
Braga Carlos Alferto Prima, The Economics of
Intellectual Property Rights and the GATT: A
view from the South, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational
Law Vol-22, No.243, 1989.
Bruch, et al., Biotechnology Policy and Industry
Regulation: Some Ecological, Social and Legal Considerations;
Submission to the House of Representatives Standing
Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, Inquiry
into Genetically Modified Organisms, The Ecologist,
Vol.21 (1991).
Busch, Lawrence, Eight Reasons Why Patents
Should not be Extended to Plants and Animals,
Biotechnology and Development Monitor, No.24, Sep.,
1995.
Chaturvedi, Sachin, Biosafety Policy and Implications
for India, Biotechnology and Development Monitor,
No.30 (1997).
Chaudhry, Sudhip, Dunkel Draft on Drug Patents: Background
and Implications Economic and Political Weekly
(EPW), Sept. 4, 1993.
Chimni B.S., The Philosophy of Patents: Strong
Regime Unjustified Journal of Scientific and
Industrial Research.
Chisum, Donald S, The Patent ability of Algorithms,
University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 47, Spring
1986, pp.959-1022.
Choudhry Peggy E. And Walsh Michael G Changing
Levels of Protection Under GATT, Nafta and the EU
The Columbia Journal of World Business, Summer, 1995.
Clunies, Tracey Ross. Creping Enclosures, Seed
Legislation, Plant Breeders Rights and Scottish
Potatoes, The Ecologist, Vol.26, No.3, May/June,
1996.
Coghlan, Andy. Licensed to Sell the Stuff of
Life, New Scientist, (11 Feb., 1995, No.1964).
Correa Carlos M. GATT Agreement: New Standards
for Patent Protection EIPR 8, 1994.
Daughtrey, S. Carren, Reverse Engineering of
Software for Interoperability and Analysis,
Venderbilt Law Review, Vol.41, 1994, pp.145-87.
Davidson, Duncan, Common Law Uncommon Software,
University of Pittsburgh Law Review, vol.47, Summer
1986, pp.1037-1117.
De Kathen, Andre, The Impact of Transgenic
Crop Releases in Developing Countries, Biotechnology
and Development Monitor, No.21, Sep., 1996.
Dennis M, Carleton, Lotus Development V Borland
International: Determining Software Copyright Infringement
is not as easy 1-2-3, University of Pittsburgh
Law Review, Vol.56 Summer 1995, pp.919-945.
Dhar Biswajit and Rao Niranjan, Dunkel Draft
on TRIPS, Complete denial of Developing Countries
Interest, EPW, Feb 8, 1992.
Patent System and Pharmaceutical Sector
EPW Oct 2, 1993.
Dhawan, Rajeev, Whose Interest? Independent
Indias Patent Law and Policy, 32 JILI,
429 (1990).
Dickson, David. UK Clinical Geneticists Ask
for a Ban on the Patenting of Human Genes, Nature,
Vol.366. No.6454 (1993).
Doyle, J., Potential Food Safety Problems Relating
to New Uses of Biotechnology, (National Academy
Press, Washington DC, 1986).
Gadbaw, Michael R Intellectual Property and
International Trade: Merger of Marriage of Convenience
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol-22, No.2,
1989.
Gadgil, Madhav and Devasia, Preston. Intellectual
Property Rights and Biological Resources, Specifying
Geographical Origins and Prior Knowledge Uses,
Current Science, (Vol.69, No.8, Oct.25, 1995).
Gana Ruth L. Has Creativity died in the Third
World Some Implications on Intellectual Property
Denver Journal of International Law and Policy Vol:
24, No.1 1995.
Garret, W.H. Barid, Toward A perceptive View
of Copyright Protection for non literal Elements of
Computer Programs: Recent Developments in the Courts,
Virginia Law Review, Vol.79, 1993, pp.2091-2127.
Gary R. Ignatin, Let the Hackers Hack: Allowing
reverse Engineering of Copyrighted Computer Programs
to Achieve Compatibility, University of Pennsylvania
Law Review, Vol. 140, May 1992, pp.1999-2050.
Gavaghen, Hellen, NIH Wins Patents on Basic
Techniques Covering all exvico Gene therapy,
Nature, Vol.1, 374, March, (1995).
Gladwell, Malcolm. Are Scientists Wrong to
Patent Genes, SPAN, April/May (1996).
Goldstein Paul, Infringement of Copyright in
Computer Programs University of Pittsburgh Law
Review, Vol. 47, Summer 1986, pp. 1119-30.
Gopalakrishnan, N.S., Diversity Related Intellectual
Property Rights, GATT Final Act, the Convention of
Biological Diversity and the Challenges, The
Academy Law Review, Vol. 18, No.142 (19994).
Gravelle, Micheline L., Biotechnology - An
Overview, 10 CIPR 1.
Hanna, Ramsay, Misusing Antitrust: The Search for
Functional Copyright Standards, Stanford Law
Review, Vol.46, Jan. 1994, pp.401-448.
Hatchwell, Paul, Opening Pandoras Box,
The Risks of Releasing Genetically Engineered Organisms,
The Ecologist, Vol.19, No.4, 1989.
Hindmarsh, Richard, The Flawed Sustainable
Promise of Genetic Engineering, The Ecologist,
Vol.21, No.5, Sep/Oct. 1991.
Hughes, Justin. The Philosophy of Intellectual
Property, 77 George Town Law Journal, 287 (1980).
Hulme, Wyndham, The History of the Patent System
under the Prerogative and at Common Law, 12
L.Q.R. 141.
Jain, H.K., Biodiversity Convention, More Losers
than Winners, Biotechnology and Development
Monitor, No.21, Dec. 1994.
Johnson, Human Insulin from Recombinant DNA
Technology, 219 Science 632, (1983).
Jon S Wilkins, Protecting Computer Programs
as Compilations Under Computer Associates V Altai
Yale Law Journal, Vol-104, NOV 1994, pp.435-69.
Jonquers, Jean, The Patent ability of Software,
ICC, Vol.18, 1997, pp.607-631.
Jorgensens, R., and Anderson, B., Spontaneous
Hybridization, the risk of growing Genetically Modified
Oil Seed Rape, 12 Am.J. of Botany, 81 (1994).
Keayla B.K. and Dhor Biswajit, Indian Pharmaceutical
Industry and Patent Regime for Drug Security
Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, Vol-52,
April 1993.
Klitzke, Roman A, Historical Background of
the English Patent Law, 41 Journal of Pat. Off.
Socy., 615, (Vol.XLI, 1959)
Koffsky, Mark, Patent Preemption of Computer
Software Contracts Restricting Reverse Engineering:
The Last Stand?, Columbia Law Review, Vo. 95,
1995, pp.1160-1187.
Lauroesh, Mark W., Genetic Engineering Innovation
and Risk Minimization, 57, George Washington
Law Review, 100 (1988).
Lemley, Mark, A and Brien, David W.O. Encouraging
Software Reuse, Stanford Law Review, Vol.49,
Jan. 1997, pp.255-304.
Lewis, Gerald J, Lotus Development Corp., V
Paperback Software International: Board Copyright
Protection for user Interfaces Ignores the Trend Towards
Standardization, University of Pittsburgh Law
Review, Vol.52, Spring 1991, pp.689-722.
Mac-Wanlto, Genetic Engineering, Hope or Hoax?,
Third World Resurgence, No.53/54.
Markey, Harward T., Patentability of Aniumals
in the United States, 20 IIC 372, (1989).
Marterer, Norbert, The Patentability of Microorganisms
per se, 18 IIC 668, (1987).
Mehrothra N.N. Patents Acts and Technological
Self Reliance: the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry
EPW, May 13, 1989.
Menell, Peter S, An Analysis of the scope of Copyright
Protection for Application Programs, Stanford
Law Review, Vol.41, May 1989, pp.1045-1104.
Mennell, Peter S, Tailoring the Legal Protection
for Computer Software, Stanford Law Review,
Vol.39, July 1987, pp.1329.
Mody D.B., Pharma Industry Post GATT Scenario
The Eastern Pharmacist, March, 1997.
Mooney, P., Beyond Biocides: People Linking
for a Sustainable Future, The Gene Exchange,
Vol.2 (1991).
Mossinghoff Gerald & Bombells Thornal The
Importance of Intellectual Property to the American
Research Intensive Pharmaceutical Industry,
The Columbia Journal of World Business, Spring, 1996.
Mugabe, John. And Duke, Evans, Control Over
Genetic Resources, Biotechnology and Development
Monitor, No.21, Dec. 1994.
Nachame, D.M. Intellectual Property Rights
in the Uruguay Round: an Indian Perspective, EPW,
Feb 4, 1995.
Nevell, Allen, The Models are Brocken, The Models
Are Broken, University of Pittsburgh Law Review,
Vol.47, Summers 1986, pp.1023-35.
Parfomak, Andrew N, The Karmarkar algorithm-New
Patentable Subject Matter? IIC, Vol.21, 1991,
pp.31-37.
Patel Surendra, J. Trade Related Intellectual
Property in Uruguay Round in GATT in Conquest
by Patents: On Patent Law and Policy NWGPL,
New Delhi.
Pistoriss, Robin. Was the U.S. Refusal to sign
CBD Necessary?, Biotechnology and Development
Monitor, No.11, Sep. 1992.
Prasad H., Ashok Chandra, and Bhaat Shripad, Strenghtening
Indias Patent System EPW, May 22, 1993.
Rae, Patricia A., Patentability of Living Subject
Matter, 10 CIPR 41 (1993).
Raskind Leo J, The uncertain Case for Special Legislation
for Protecting Computer Software, university
of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol.47, Summer 1986, pp.1131-84.
Regal J Philip. Critical Issues in Biotechnology,
Third World Resurgence, No.53/54, Jan/Feb. 1995.
Rothley, Willi. European Parliament must think
again about Biotechnological Protection, 26
IIC, 688 (1995).
Sahai, Suman, Intellectual Property Rights
Over Life Forms: What Should Guide Indias Position,
E.P.W., Jan 19, 1994.
Patenting Genetic Resources: Sigh CBD Necessary?,
Biotechnology and Development Monitor, No.11, Sep.
1992.
Patenting Life Forms: What it Implies?
E.P.W., April 25, 1992.
The Suigeneris System, E.P.W. Dec.11,
1993.
Samuelson, Pamela, Benson Revisited The Case
Against Patent Protection for algorithms and Other
Computer Program Related Inventions, Emory Law
Journal, Vol.39, 1990, pp.1025-1154.
Seidel, Superculation and Embryo Transfer in
Cattle, 218, Science 341 (1981).
Shiva, Vandana, GATT and the Biodiversity Convention,
EPW, April 3, (1993).
Soltysinki, Stanislaw, Protection of Computer
Programs: Comparative and International Aspects,
IIC, Vol.21, 1990, pp.1-30.
Stern, Richard H, The Bundle of Rights Suited
to New Technology, University of Pittsburgh
Law Review, Vol.47, Summer 1986, pp.1229-67.
Teter, Timothy, Merger and Machines: An Analysis
of the Pro-Compatibility Trend in Computer Software
Copyright Cases, Stanford Law Review, Vol 45,
April 1993, pp.1061-98.
Tripathy R.C., Grover S.S. and Chakrivarthy A.K.,
Computer Software and Intellectual Property
Rights Present Status in India and Future Direction,
Electronics and Planning, Vol.21, Jan. 1998, pp.195-223.
Uchtenhagen, Ulrich, The GATT Negotiations
Concerning Copyright and Intellectual Property Protection,
IIC, Vol.21, 1990, pp.765-82.
Uritz, Daniel, The Myth of Intent in Equal
Protection, Stanford Law Review, Vol.41, July
1989, pp.1352-1469.
Weinreb, Lloyd, Copyright for Functional Expression,
Harward Law Review, Vol.111, 1998, pp.1050-1254.
Werner Moritz, Hans, Assignment of Computer
Software for Use on a Data Processing System and the
Applicability of Know how Licensing Rules, IIC,
Vol.21, 1990, pp.799-816.
Willis, Peter R., The Ecological Hazards of
Transgenic Varieties, Third World Resurgence,
No.53/54.